Sunday, December 10, 2017

Hillary's Secret


What was someone up to in that first Trump - Clinton debate?

Watch this - - -


But here the University people are missing the point, that man can take away any notes Hillary might have made, UNLESS, they were notes from Donna Brazile with the questions, which was later admitted by Mz Brazile that she supplied questions ahead of time to Clinton, and not that the podium is lit, (Trump's screen never lit)  but should hers have been? And were there prompts supplied from somewhere else to Secretary Clinton and she may be receiving secret messages via that screen? Is there an electronic device in the podium that must be removed quickly after the debate to avoid discovery? (grey-haired man in glasses?)

But what is intriguing to me is that RED light in the darkness that flashes as she reaches the podium at the start, (at 0:43) exactly when her podium screen lights and then flicks again at the end of the debate (3:00) when the teleprompter screen goes off. Is it a wireless impulse turning ON a connection just like your TV remote? Is someone out there in the dark transmitting electronic signals?

Is the prompter screen telling Hillary information during the debate? Could it be help from several people tucked away in a separate room somewhere with answers and advice? Even with Donna Brazil's cheating did they have even more help for Hillary?
Was part of her cadre tucked away in a room off site? Perhaps in an electronic van from her motorcade? Incredible? Maybe. But did you know that US drone missions in Afghanistan are flown by pilots in a room in Minnesota? Reality.

So it is proven by multi-videos that Hillary's podium had an active screen when Trump's didn't. So in a debate, it is supposed to be one on one, questions and answers and zingers. But you are supposed to be on your own out there, thinking on your feet, showing voters how quick you are in the mental department. Having a secret room full of stealthy participants using spy technology to give you a head start is not allowed.

Hillary Clinton's podium appears to have been outfitted with a special light that Donald Trump's didn't have. The light could have been functioning as a teleprompter to feed Hillary answers. There were multiple people paying attention to her podium after the debate and they were clearly tampering with something. Especially a man with grey hair and glasses dubbed the cleaner man who approached her podium and was either picking up items or putting something in or possibly doing a swap from a tampered device to the original legit device? The Hillary device being one that could accept info over a wireless channel?

There are many videos which show that little grey-haired man in glasses doing something at her podium. Tampering? Removing evidence of cheating? He takes away some papers, but what item does he pocket discreetly? No one seems to know who he was.


And this election is for the President of the United States. Anything goes. Even cheating.


But those earrings.
Can earrings be made into wireless transmitters or more important, wireless receivers? Of course they can, that technology is not even new, and miniaturization has made it possible to hide it anywhere! Cameras are buttons on your coat now, and receivers are simple ear pieces fitted to the inner ear, or easily built into a nice pair of gold earrings!



Like these.
Here is the technology -




All are receivers, spyware. Bond has nothing on Hillary.  She has her very own 'Q'.
The three debates. Same earrings?

But anything goes? Was it all 'rigged' as The Donald protested so often? Donna Brazil even said so later, after she got caught.
Hillary cheating? And who else is cheating. The MSM is constantly under attack of late because the public are beginning to believe they cheat too. Fake News has entered our lexicon with a flash. Who knows where it is headed? Stay awake folks.

We haven't even got to the square bulky thingy under her jacket, which her cast of characters said was an anti coughing device! lol. And the picture was part of the after debate handshakes which clearly shows even the wires running up her jacket inside. But odd yet again that NBC shortened the video from 2 plus hours to 1:39. Nicely cutting out the footage that contains this incriminating shot.




So you cannot see this part anymore. So thanks to all the watchers who are smart enough to record things like this the first time. It shows a serious threat to truth by people with a treacherous agenda.

The deception never ends, does it?

Stay awake folks.

Saturday, October 28, 2017

JFK Revelations?

The first release of (some) details of the Kennedy assassination that have been held back for 55 years is out. These items were deemed so explosive that they here held secreted in the National Archives for a further 25 years after their first scheduled release.

There are about 3,100 unseen files, a deadline that was set by Congress in 1992 under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act. The documents have been held in the National Archives, and the majority are already public.

American royalty


Here are what some commentators call  'interesting things'. As we know now, the CIA has over-ruled President Trump and held back further information for 180 days.


- Former CIA director Richard Helms: LBJ thought Kennedy assassination was payback for assassination of Vietnam president. From a 1975 deposition at Langley, CIA HQ,  "President Johnson used to go around saying that the reason President Kennedy was assassinated was that he had assassinated President Diem."
     Over many years investigators have concluded that not only did LBJ hate all Kennedys, but that he was aware of the event before it happened. Was this his attempt to deflect suspicions from American plots?

The CIA considered using mafia to kill Castro. Robert Kennedy told the FBI in 1975 that an "intermediary had been hired by CIA" to consult mobster Sam Giancana about hiring a gunman for $150,000 to kill Castro in Cuba.
The account is detailed in an FBI memorandum from 1975. The memo is part of an 83-page report that also said the CIA considered delivering a poison pill to kill Castro. Attorney General Robert Kennedy vetoed the idea of using a Mafia gangster.
     Again in 1975 this supposedly happened. And we all know by now that J. Edgar Hoover hated the Kennedy's with a vengeance. Other attempts to kill Castro were poison pills etc. RFK had stated long before that he was going to break the Mafia in America into splinters.

A memo from Hoover quotes a source within the USSR saying Soviets were shocked by the news of Kennedy's death, with church bells tolled in his memory. The source said the news sparked "great shock and consternation and church bells were tolled in the memory of President Kennedy."
"According to our source, officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union believed there was some well-organized conspiracy on the part of the 'ultra-right' in the United States to effect a 'coup,'" the memo said.
     Some people believe the coup might have been started then, and continued over the years until the placement and surreptitious effects were instigated, perhaps when George HW Bush became Director of the CIA? And that the coup of America needn't be armed men on every corner, but only the total manipulation and control of American lives. 

There are many other items, including someone who called the FBI with info that he was part of a group going to kill the President. And another anonymous caller to a British Newspaper the day of.



But one has to wonder why any of these so called revelations were considered secrets? There is nothing (so far) in the least explosive, and most of this info seems to come from FBI 'memos'.
Yes, the conspiracy theorists are already saying the CIA has had fifty years to manufacture any documents they wish. Which leads to the suggestion that at one time, way back in recent history, there WAS something incriminating in those National Archive documents.
Administration officials said there was no cover-up, just an effort to avoid compromising national security, law enforcement or intelligence gathering methods. Whatever methods might be suspect today, are long past blame on present day agencies. If this was just an attempt to convince America that all is well, it is too late, many have already turned to WikiLeaks for truth.

And most of the spin on this event, seems to point to a plot being Castro and Cuba. Perhaps so the America public will no longer think of CIA dark state cells, or FBI obfuscation, the Federal Reserve controlling all the money, or the MSM potentates squeezing your news down to what they want you to see and hear, or the Middle East oil cartels sponsoring election spending, or the so called Drug War designed to fail - or agents put in place, oblivious to their own supervisors, to implement the continuing coup of America.
No one needs a poll to conclude that Castro did not kill the President of America, something else has been going on, perhaps that is the reason the Establishment is so wired up with angst about Donald Trump?

These 'revelations' are for all those people who long ago, read the Warren Report Summery, without reading the basis of it and the facts that it was supposedly drawn from. Those who looked further, (Mark Lane - Rush to Judgement) quickly learned that the summery had no relation whatsoever to events on November 22 in Dallas.

The release of harmless information as revelations will only throw gasoline on the fires of conspiracy.
Business as usual. Keep your tin hat on, it's not over yet ....



Check out ideas about Officer JD Tippit -
50th-anniversary-of-warren-commission report

Mark Lane's book -  
Rush to Judgment 

Who was she?
The Babushka Lady 










And: You can read my ideas of the death of Officer Tippet here and the following film will explain WHY he was killed and by who -  50th-anniversary-of-warren-commission.html



New:
Don't expect this next film to stay on any website anywhere for much longer - but if you are interested in JFK and how his death relates to the so called Deep State now emerging into public awareness in 2017, and how you are being manipulated you need to understand why. - you should watch this before it is gone. It is hypnotic and revolutionary and will definitely change how you view your present world. 

(for the present it is also view-able on Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM )




Tuesday, October 24, 2017

USA - A Warring Nation

 From the jungles of Vietnam to the deserts of Afghanistan - - -


 
  An American Army helicopter flying over Helmand Province, Afghanistan.   
                       Credit Andrew Renneisen/Getty Images

The United States has been at war continuously since the attacks of 9/11 and now has just over 240,000 active-duty and reserve troops in at least 172 countries and territories. While the number of men and women deployed overseas has shrunk considerably over the past 60 years, the military’s reach has not. American forces are actively engaged not only in the conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen that have dominated the news, but also in Niger and Somalia, both recently the scene of deadly attacks, as well as Jordan, Thailand and elsewhere.

An additional 37,813 troops serve on presumably secret assignment in places listed simply as “unknown.” The Pentagon provided no further explanation.

There are traditional deployments in Japan (39,980 troops) and South Korea (23,591) to defend against North Korea and China, if needed, along with 36,034 troops in Germany, 8,286 in Britain and 1,364 in Turkey — all NATO allies. There are 6,524 troops in Bahrain and 3,055 in Qatar, where the United States has naval bases.


Active and reserve service members stationed overseas ;
Japan - 39,980, more troop reside here than in any other foreign country.
Afghanistan - 11,965 The US is engaged in training and counter terrorism operations.
Ieaq - 7,602 The US combat missions here ended in 2010, so remaining troops are officially advising and training Iraqi forces.

Note: as of June 30, 2017. Source: Defense Manpower Data Center (NY Times)


      The U.S. Has Troops in Nearly Every Country  - - -
America’s operations in conflict zones like Africa are expanding: 400 American Special Forces personnel in Somalia train local troops fighting the Shabab Islamist group, providing intelligence and sometimes going into battle with them. 
One member of the Navy SEALs was killed there in  a mission in May.  On Oct. 14, a massive attack widely attributed to the Shabab on a Mogadishu street killed more than 270 people, which would show the group’s increased reach. 
About 800 troops are based in Niger, where four Green Berets died on Oct. 4.
Many of these forces are engaged in counterterrorism operations against the Taliban in Afghanistan, for instance; against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria; against an affiliate of Al Qaeda in Yemen. 

Total military personnel worldwide - 1,302,941.  The figures reported here include personnel serving in the U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps. and Air Force. However they do not include military contractors or private army personnel.

So far, Americans seem to accept that these missions and the deployments they require will continue indefinitely. Still, it’s a very real question whether, in addition to endorsing these commitments, which have cost trillions of dollars and many lives over 16 years, they will embrace new entanglements of the sort President Trump has seemed to portend with his rash threats and questionable decisions on North Korea and Iran.

For that reason alone, it’s time to take stock of how broadly American forces are already committed to far-flung regions and to begin thinking hard about how much of that investment is necessary, how long it should continue and whether there is a strategy beyond just killing terrorists. 

During earlier wars, including Vietnam, the draft put most families at risk of having a loved one go to war, but now America has all-volunteer armed forces. Less than 1 percent of the population now serves in the military, compared with more than 12 percent in World War II. Most people simply do not have a family member in harm’s way.

Since 9/11, American leaders have defined the fight against terrorism as a permanent struggle against a permanent threat. But the rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria and a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan led to renewed engagement, though at lower troop levels. Terror attacks here and in Europe, have reinforced the public’s sense of siege.

The military is essential to national security, but it is not the only thing keeping America safe. So do robust diplomacy and America’s engagement in multilateral institutions. The Pentagon, by contrast, thrives. After some belt-tightening during the financial crisis, it has a receptive audience in Congress and the White House as it pushes for more money to improve readiness and modernize weapons. Senators who balk at paying for health care and the basic diplomatic missions of the State Department approved a $700 billion defense budget for 2017-18.



Whether this largess will continue is unclear. But the larger question involves the American public and how many new military adventures, if any, it is prepared to tolerate.

 A version of this editorial appears in print on October 23, 2017, on Page A20 of the New York edition with the headline: America’s Forever Wars.

And people are beginning to question - Where is the Threat?
The 2000 Global Report published in 1980 had outlined “the State of the World” by focusing on so-called  “level of threats” which might negatively influence or undermine US interests.
Twenty years later, US strategists, in an attempt to justify their military interventions in different parts of the World, have conceptualized the greatest fraud in US history, namely “the Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT). The latter, using a fabricated pretext  constitutes a global war against all those who oppose US hegemony. A modern form of slavery, instrumented through militarization and the “free market” has unfolded.

Major elements of the conquest and world domination strategy by the US refer to:
1) the control of the world economy and its financial markets,
2) the taking over of all natural resources (primary resources and nonrenewable sources of energy). The latter constitute the cornerstone of US power through the activities of its multinational corporations.



Secret drone bases are proliferating on foreign soil, flying devices like armed MQ-9 Reapers and a myriad of others. The progress of the covert agenda seems to be going as planned.




Friday, October 6, 2017

Here we go again ...

Shooting in Las Vegas; too many questions already. Motive seems to be elusive.


 - One shooter or more? Police scanners reveal police were frantically talking about other areas for source of shots. Fourth floor. Center of the hotel? Other floors? The roof?
- 32nd floor windows broken in two separate rooms. Shots came from both rooms? Why would Stephen Paddock rent two rooms? Was someone else present in the other? Would he have ran between the two rooms during firing?
- Why does the FBI say he registered one certain day, and hotel records show he was there 3 days earlier?
- Did he try to register in other hotels during other concerts? Did he, in fact, really book rooms personally in Chicago overlooking the Lollapalooza Festival in August? Or was that a set-up ala Lee Harvey Oswald?
- Why 23 rifles in the room? Some AK47s. The massive arsenal was believed to include  an AR-15, four DDM4 rifles, three FN-15 rifles and Sig Saur rifles. Were they samples being offered for a potential sale to terrorists?
- Was Stephen Paddock an illegal arms dealer?
- Maybe they were going to be bought by ISIS?
- Was Paddock converted to Islam on one of his cruise trips to the Middle East? Was Marilou Danley with him? 
- Who was the earlier visitor to Paddock's room? The buyer? Food was ordered, was that to enable a camera to be placed in the hallway on the food dolly?
- How did he install cameras into the hallway without being noticed? Did he have the equipment with him to use wireless camera transmission?
- How did Paddock get all that weaponry into his room without suspicion?
- Why did Police stand down when they were on the 30th floor and wait a long time before moving to 32? Waiting for SWAT? Who told them to wait?
- Who is the hotel security guard who was shot in the leg and said, 'he got into it with the shooter.'?
- Different sounds from weapons firing? Different weapons?
- Why 1600 rounds of ammo in his car and 50 pounds of explosives? Who put it there and when?
- How did Paddock have a continual run of decades as a successful gambler?
- Was he actually laundering money? For who?
- Why haven't his two former wives and two other brothers been interviewed?
- Did the  $100K wire transfer go to Japan or the Philippines? If to his girlfriend, Marilou Danley, what did she use it for?
- Who was the 'other woman' seen with Paddock before the event? Was she the one who told concert goers that they were going to die tonight?
- Police shut down elevators quickly but did someone simply leave the 32nd floor suite and just enter a different room on another floor after killing Paddock?
- Why haven't the FBI triangulated the trajectory of the bullets from holes in the concert grounds and other incidental targets?
- Is there a conflict of beliefs between Sheriff Lombardo of the Clark County, Las Vegas Police and the overseeing FBI agent Aaron Rouse?

- Who really shot Stephen Paddock? And was he killed before the shooting actually started?


Why did all this happen? Too many questions and not enough answers.

Who is thinking 9-11?

Not me.


addenda 1 -



Are the shots at 0:22 - :29 and :30 a handgun shooting out the windows in one room, and then at :49, :50, :51 the other window in the adjoining suite?

Listen carefully at 4:05 - 4:08 to TWO separate automatic rifles firing! How does one guy do that?

Hmm?

addenda 2 - (Oct 10)
The FBI has not released any surveillance video of the Vegas shootings or hotel security video.
What's more, many witnesses who had their cell/smart phones taken by the FBI got them back today, (Oct 12) but they have been completely wiped clean of all info!
Are you starting to think false flag or what?
No, not me either
Hmm (2)

addenda 3 - (Oct. 14)
Now Jesus Campos, the Mandalay Bay security guard who, it was first reported by the police, had stopped the shooting from the 32nd floor suite, 10 minutes after it started, and had been shot by Paddock, is missing! He disappeared after cancelling several TV appearances.
And it is now revealed that he was shot 6 minutes BEFORE the shooting! Further questions are being asked if Campos was ever actually a real security guard at Mandalay Bay, or indeed, even registered in the State of Nevada as all security needs to be!
Reporters at his home were told by someone that they were not allowed to talk about it! Was Campos part of the scheme and up there on floor 32 as a lookout and to ensure that the shooters escaped before police or SWAT got up there? 
Is Campos about to be 'suicided'?
Just still wondering.
Hmm (3)

addenda 4 - Oct 15
An eye witness who was at the Route 91 Harvest Festival and was convinced there were multiple shooters has been found dead in her bed at home. Kymberley Sochumel survived the shooting unhurt, went home and posted her report on facebook. She was found by her grandmother in the morning. Her death has been suggested to be caused by a brain aneurysm. She was 28. Her post was going viral until it was taken down.

Hmm (4)

addenda 5 - (Oct 16)
And now who are these guys at the Tropicana? Cops? They don't act like cops, don't even act like they are trained? FBI? Private security? What are they up to? Why are they carrying a stretcher? Can they point a machine gun at patrons with impunity? Who are the last two guys?
Watch the Outer Light vid and see what you think?   > > >       Tropicana strange video

On the night of the event, there were many police calls of other shooters in Caesar's, Bellagio, NY NY and several of an active shooter at Tropicana. Were they real or planted confusions to scatter the first responders?        

Hmm (5)

addenda 6 - (Oct 17)
Now the parking valet, Chad Nishimura, after saying Paddock only had regular bags when he arrived and that a car was positioned at the hotel just before the shootings, has also disappeared. The official narrative says he has not disappeared but no one knows where he is.
Paddock had been allowed as a heavy gambler,?? (someone saying this, not me) to have access to a service elevator. Why would a hotel do this? Was it to accommodate heavy packages taken to his room? Does that elevator need a key or code to operate? Was it to allow a secret escape when police would be covering all the regular elevators?
Hmm (6)

addenda 7 - (Oct 29)
Two witnesses who survived the shooting have been killed in a car crash  near their Riverside California home. Their vehicle was immediately engulfed in flames, Dennis Carver, 52, and wife Lorraine, 53, died together less than half a mile from their home after crashing into a metal gate.
According to the Riverside County Fire Department, their vehicle crashed just outside their community at 10:50 p.m. on the 20000 block of Avenida De Arboles. It took firefighters nearly an hour to completely put out the fire, the department said in a statement. No comment on why the fire was so intense.
No report on what kind of car they were driving. The road evidently turned in one direction but their car veered the opposite.
Some might recall the crash of journalist Michael Hastings' Mercedes that was suspected to have been electronically hacked in an engineered crash because of his political investigations.

Danny Contreras, another eyewitness present at the concert who identified more than one shooter has been found dead in a vacant home of multiple gun shots.
Hmm (7)

Nov30
Yet another witness has died in a car accident. No one knows where any other witnesses are, or employees, or cops who were there. Total shut down. Nothing to see here folks, move on ....

addenda 8 - (Dec 6)
Tucker Carlson in Vegas asking questions which only birthed more questions. Watch this - - -

Tucker Carlson in Las Vegas - explosive -

How did the second adjoining door get locked if Paddock killed himself? They said they had to breach it. Why would a policeman discharge his gun if the window shooter (Paddock?) was already dead? Why was there TWO shooting positions? Why did a Mandalay Bay executive sign the special permit papers for a concert across the street? WHERE was the LV SWAT team on the night?
It never ends but you can now follow by the stink.




Saturday, September 16, 2017

Gobsmacked

From an article of a freelance writer, She just won't go away.

     "I was just gobsmacked, wiped out."
former Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton.

     Ms. Clinton is out pitching her new book, 'What Happened' - her vision of the reason for her dramatic and unexpected loss to President Donald Trump. It is the latest in a series of planned and scripted events designed to blame everyone but herself for her stunning loss. - according to Slate reporter Daniel Politi.

     The former candidate said she was gobsmacked by her loss to Trump. 'I went into a frenzy of closet cleaning and long walks in the woods, playing with my dogs, and as I write - yoga, alternate nostril breathing, which I highly recommend, tryin' to calm myself down. And, you know, my share of Chardonnay. It was a very hard transition. I really struggled, I couldn't feel. I couldn't think. I was just gobsmacked, wiped out.'

     And she was scripted and rehearsed for that response to CBS' Jane Pauley, a long time friend and admirer of Ms. Clinton and thus a safe and compliant interviewer. Scripted and rehearsed right down the the use of the term, gobsmacked. Which is a a term not common in Ms. Clinton's lexicon but one finding increased use among Ivy League elites including speechwriters for Ms. Clinton. Gobsmacked may be a clever phrase but her use of it reinforces for all that she is less than genuine.

     Greg Jarret of Foxnews has accumulated a list of twenty-six and/or events to which Ms. Clinton has assigned blame for her loss - none of them include herself. The list does include the traditional Democratic bugaboos - racism, misogyny, sexism, as well as the current themes - the Russians, former FBI director James Comey, Mr. Trump, and on and on. The only two things missing from the list appear to be former President Barack Obama and the Muslims.

      Republicans have provided their own lists. Most of these lists center around Ms. Clinton's corruption, (Whitewater, futures trading, the private email accounts and server used for State Department business, the missing 30,000 emails, the Clinton Foundation Pay to Play allegations, lying, stonewalling, Benghazi, etc) Some note her lack of accomplishments despite the heady positions she has held. And still some others refer to a list of campaign mistakes centering on where she did or did not spend her time and campaign funds.

     Yes, Ms. Clinton has accepted nominal responsibility for her defeat. An acceptance that is then followed by the enumeration of all those people and the factors she actually blames. In an address to the Code Conference in California in May, Ms. Clinton stated - "I take responsibility for every decision I made, but that's not why I lost."

     She then went on to list media bias, slanted coverage about her emails, and Russia as being among the real reasons for her loss. In this and other 'admissions' Ms. Clinton clearly accepts, 'positional responsibility' while rejecting personal responsibility. She acknowledges responsibility simply because things happened while she was the candidate, but rejects personal responsibility that she was the cause of any of those things.

     But all of these miss the mark. Ms. Clinton is easily the least authentic person to ever reach national prominence. In the last twenty years there has not been a public moment for Ms. Clinton that was not tested, scripted, choreographed and rehearsed. Not just what she says, but her movements, her facial expressions and even her regional dialect and slang. But the American people, despite her disdain for Middle America, are perceptive. A classic moment for Ms. Clinton occurred during the primary season in a restaurant in Iowa where she stood off to one side of the crowd that gathered, ignoring them one and all until the lights came on and she donned her smile, her hearty laugh, and 'locked-in' gaze  with each person to whom she spoke. And when the camera lights went off, Ms. Clinton was one again detached and remote.

     The last authentic moment for Ms. Clinton was the fit of rage she disgorged on election eve. Alone with her family and senior campaign staff, Ms. Clinton awaited the inevitable confirmation of her inevitable election to be the next President of the United States.
When she lost Florida and North Carolina and her 'firewall' states, (Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio and Pennsylvania} began to crumble her anticipated elation gave way to rage. She cursed, threw objects, assaulted John Podesta and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, railed about the unfairness of it all, and cursed any and all who failed to deliver her to victory. It was genuine emotion - a particularly ugly emotion, but genuine nonetheless.

     What made it even worse for Ms. Clinton is that because of a collaborative relationship with the mainstream press she got away with this scripted persona. Only those in the media predisposed to play 'softball' with her (even to the point of sharing the questions to be asked before hand) were permitted interviews. In live appearances should someone deviate from the norm of adulation, Ms. Clinton donned a grimaced smile, provided a flip answer and walked away from the microphones. (Remember, Ms. Clinton's first response about her use of a private email account and the destruction of emails - they were about yoga classes and her daughter's wedding - and her quick exit from the microphones when more difficult questions were asked.

     But the American public was never fooled. We have all encountered phonies in our lives and it generally takes less than a millisecond to recognize them. And our reaction to them is pretty common - we don't trust them, we try to avoid them, and we never willingly invite them.


     Ms Clinton is not alone as a well-rehearsed politician but she is so much so one that she has become a caricature. She earned the defeat she suffered.
     And she has earned the infamy of her moniker, 'Crooked Hillary', forever.


     Say what you might about President Trump. Love him of hate him. In the end most breathe a sigh of relief, 'At least he's not Hillary.'


- - - Daniel Politi - from Slate Magazine.


Tuesday, April 4, 2017

FBI RELEASE OF 9/11 PENTAGON PHOTOS

Just wondering about this ...

The FBI has just newly released*  'never before seen' photos from 9/11. It is on Twitter and social media as well as many media outlets, few of them MSM.
Seems like a long time to make a decision like that, considering that they took away over 200 surveillance tapes from local area businesses on the day. And finding out that the Pentagon's own hundred or so cameras were not working or were (mysteriously) shut off on that day. And then the agency only showed us 4 frames of something blasting into the Pentagon on 9/11.

Many will suspect that someone in a US government agency had plenty of time to Photoshop anything they wanted into any pics. But there are still no wings, no tail section, no fuselage, no luggage, no engines strewn on that Pentagon lawn. No dead BODIES! And no belief anywhere that even the best pilots could have flown like a Tom Cruise Top-Gun Air Ace, never mind ANY pilot from al Qaeda or any other terrorist group.
However, a cruise missile (no pun) or an armed Global Hawk is another thing entirely ....

Have a look at these, anything odd to you? Like in this aerial view, we see that whatever smashed through the first (outside) building, seemed to get through the second building without a trace, and then resumed its destruction on the third in line building. Which, is effectually through the 6th reinforced concrete wall. Hmm?


I thought I read somewhere that there were LAWS of physics. ???




Seems incredible to me, but there are certain engineers who will use the same logic from WTC 1 and 2 to explain. They said then that the already burning jet fuel ran down 110 floors without being absorbed into the concrete, without burning out, and caused molten steel to be still burning in the basements four weeks later!
So those same spinner engineers will tell us a missile OR a whole 737 could somehow wiggle through the second Pentagon layer building without damaging it, yet burn the third. Sure, tell that one to Einstein.

Meanwhile most skeptics will continue the scrutiny of new releases of information or photos from that day. From whomever releases them. All these photos are harmless, show nothing new and are basically irrelevant.
The only thing is when you read the captions, the comments and info seem to be doing nothing but still trying to convince us that a passenger plane full of people, piloted by crazed Arabs with super-hero skills, crashed on that day.






Nice lil round hole. No Boeing junk. They explain any other holes in Pentagon walls to explosions caused by heat. Hmm. They did find some scrap metal parts of damaged fuselage from an American Airlines plane. But none scorched and all on that famous lawn that didn't burn. Must be rubber to bounce this far from the scene ....




Here is a more revealing photo from that fateful day, which although whatever is under that blue tarp is covered, exposes a lot more than intended ....if it is passenger plane debris, WHY would it need to be covered?


(not among new releases)

Why? Maybe because it is the identifiable remains of a Global Hawk?

Is it under that tarp for the same reason all that WTC 1, 2 and 7 steel went to China in the immediate hours after the demolition? Get it the hell out of here? Someone might find residual thermite?

This ain't over yet.


You can look at them here - keep in mind they are sometimes days after the fact when taken and it is YEARS after the fact now -
FBI release photos - BBC

See all 27 here -  FBI vault pics






*newly released - - - FBI spokeswoman Jillian Stickels said the pictures were first posted online in 2011. But a technical glitch caused them to disappear from the site for an undetermined period of time, she added. They were restored in recent days to public view once the FBI learned they were missing, according to the FBI spokeswoman.

The old technical glitch again.

Are these really the untouched original photos?

Just wondering.

Also check out the only 3 minutes of a missile hitting the Pentagon - - -